<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Faq on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/faq/</link><description>Recent content in Faq on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:37 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/faq/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Figuring FAQ (scifi.stackexchange.com)</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/02/18/figuring-faq-scifi-stackexchange-com/</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:50:37 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/02/18/figuring-faq-scifi-stackexchange-com/</guid><description>&lt;p>The &lt;a href="http://scifi.stackexchange.com">scifi.stackexchange.com&lt;/a> community (or more accurately, the &lt;a href="http://meta.scifi.stackexchange.com">meta.scifi.stackexchange.com&lt;/a> community) is still trying to figure out what&amp;rsquo;s on-topic, even though it doesn&amp;rsquo;t appear that the meta consensus directly influences the actual reality of the site.
When I last left the search for an elevator pitch, I wondered whether the FAQs of the other (launched) sites would be a fertile ground for inspiration. So, here goes - this is the same list of sites as last time:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>