<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Idol on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/idol/</link><description>Recent content in Idol on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:31:36 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/idol/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mahalo Daily Host Search (Follow Up)</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/06/04/mahalo-daily-host-search-follow-up/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:31:36 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/06/04/mahalo-daily-host-search-follow-up/</guid><description>&lt;p>Earlier, I gave &lt;a href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/mahalo-vlog-idol">my opinions&lt;/a> about the six potential new co-hosts for &lt;a href="http://mahalodaily.com">Mahalo Daily&lt;/a>.  Since then, 3 were eliminated, then another, and now the final winner has been chosen, although who it is will only be announced tomorrow.
In terms of the first elimination, I agree with &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/JasonCalacanis">Jason&amp;rsquo;s&lt;/a> comment that if you don&amp;rsquo;t turn up you don&amp;rsquo;t get the job.  Unless there was a last minute family emergency or something like that, then you need to demonstrate a fanatical willingness to do the job to get the job in the first place.  So, although I thought Nadine was the best choice, and Michelle was good, I agreed that eliminating them was the right thing to do.  (From Jason&amp;rsquo;s comments, it&amp;rsquo;s obvious that Nadine wouldn&amp;rsquo;t have got through anyway.  Hopefully she&amp;rsquo;ll turn up in something else that isn&amp;rsquo;t MySpace).
Dropping &lt;a href="http://sarahatwood.wordpress.com/">Sarah&lt;/a> next was surprising - I expected that &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/paperkristina">Kristina&lt;/a> would go first, just based on experience (it really did seem like it would take a while for her to get up to the professional quality that &lt;a href="http://mahalodaily.com">Mahalo Daily&lt;/a> seems to be aimed at).  I ranked Sarah last, so that fit with me - she seems to have got something out of the experience, and if &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Lons/statuses/826535831">she &amp;amp; Lon do start a film podcast&lt;/a>, it&amp;rsquo;s possible I&amp;rsquo;ll listen to that as well as &lt;a href="http://filmspotting.net">Filmspotting&lt;/a>.
Kristina was obviously going to go before Leah &amp;amp; Andrea.  For all the &amp;ldquo;dark horse&amp;rdquo; comments, she clearly was not of the same quality as the others, and while she might well have got there after a while, it doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem like this is the right place to be learning those skills.
At this point, the &amp;ldquo;viral video&amp;rdquo; contest was introduced.  I understand the reasoning behind this - the host does need to be able to be creative and imaginative, and hopefully &amp;ldquo;think outside the box&amp;rdquo;.  Producing episodes that actually do spread would obviously also be great, since at least some viewers would start watching regularly.  However, it was certainly a huge challenge - predicting what video will next catch the eye of the Internet masses is basically impossible.  At least they didn&amp;rsquo;t base the winner on the number of &lt;a href="http://youtube.com">YouTube&lt;/a> views or something like that (although it would have been better to let the videos spread for a few days I think).
First to appear was Andrea&amp;rsquo;s Guitar Hero training video:
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=YacKD8CDyJg]
This was pretty disappointing, since I would have previously chosen Andrea over Leah.  Problems:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Mahalo Vlog Idol</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/05/22/mahalo-vlog-idol/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:24:00 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/05/22/mahalo-vlog-idol/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;strong>Update&lt;/strong>: There&amp;rsquo;s now &lt;a href="http://www.mahalodaily.com/2008/05/22/md127-mahalo-vlog-idol-voting-and-reno-911-interview/">a proper place to vast a real (presumably non-binding) vote&lt;/a>.  Go to it!
I listen to a lot of different podcasts, but watch very few (I have a lot of ear-time free, but not much eye-time).&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Apple&amp;rsquo;s &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/business/theater/">Quick Tip of the Week&lt;/a> is extremely short and although I know the majority of the tips already, I can spare a minute to possibly learn something new (I don&amp;rsquo;t know why they target it at business users).&lt;/li>
&lt;li>I have watched &lt;a href="http://commandn.tv">CommandN&lt;/a> much longer than any other.  It borders on being too long for my taste, and is often more mediocre than great, but it&amp;rsquo;s good enough to continue with for now (and the last couple of episodes have had much better video quality).  I would drop this first.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>I love &lt;a href="http://geekbrief.tv">Geekbrief.TV&lt;/a>.  Great &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cali_Lewis">host&lt;/a>, great length, good content.  I would drop this last.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;a href="http://www.pixelcorps.tv/macbreak">MacBreak (video)&lt;/a>: The video quality is great, but the intros are really far too long.  There needs to be more content than intro+outro!  The really short shows that cover events are often the best.  Many of the hosts are not that great - sticking with &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Lindsay">Alex&lt;/a> and a couple of others would work fine.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;a href="http://mahalodaily.com">Mahalo Daily&lt;/a>: I&amp;rsquo;ve never really understood the attraction people have for &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veronica_Belmont">Veronica Belmont&lt;/a>.  Maybe you have to be familiar with her from previous work (which I&amp;rsquo;m not) or something.  The first 100 shows were a mixed bag - some good, some awful - but they were at least the right length and well produced.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>The astonishing thing about &lt;a href="http://daily.mahalo.com">Mahalo Daily&lt;/a> is that their search for a new (co)host has produced more compelling viewing than the show itself previously was.  I&amp;rsquo;m not a fan of [Country] Idol, The Bachelor, etc, but &lt;a href="http://mahalo.com/Mahalo_vlogidol">Mahalo Vlog Idol&lt;/a> (not a great name) has been funny, entertaining, and even informative.  I don&amp;rsquo;t care how long they stretch it out for (and it has been a while already!) - it&amp;rsquo;s good watching.
One of the baffling things about the contest has been the judges&amp;rsquo; picks - my suspicion is that there are elements of the contestants that don&amp;rsquo;t show up well on camera, and the judges have so far been judging more on the live aspects of the contestants than solely watching what we the audience see.  A couple of people got through that really just seemed very low quality.
The first round ([Country] Idol style), and second round (&amp;ldquo;The Batchelon&amp;rdquo;) were solely judged (as far as we know) by &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Calacanis">Jason&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Albrecht">Alex&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loren_Feldman">Loren&lt;/a> (who &lt;em>is&lt;/em> he?).  For the third round, where each contestant created their own Mahalo Daily episode, the audience has been asked to offer their opinion about how everyone did (although this clearly won&amp;rsquo;t be binding).  Perhaps with the last round, there will be real voting?
FWIW, my opinions are (ranked best to worse - and you should &lt;a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=268169548">subscribe&lt;/a> to the show, rather than watch these crap Youtube quality versions):
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=lMGA4R3otrc]
Nadine would be a perfect choice for next host.  She has a great look, distinct from Veronica, but still in the &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://mahalo.com">Mahalo&lt;/a>&amp;rdquo; style.  She&amp;rsquo;s exceptionally attractive, and produced a great episode.  Like Leah, there&amp;rsquo;s a variety of people interviewed, which helps make a more interesting episode, and there are really good popups.  There were a couple of weak spots in the middle, but they didn&amp;rsquo;t detract from the episode, and generally the interviewing was good.  She feels like she brings in a style already; more so than the others.
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=9qljUTW0v-s]
I vacillated between Leah and Nadine as #1 - they&amp;rsquo;re really equally as good.  All I could come up with as a deciding factor was that Nadine is slightly &amp;lsquo;hotter&amp;rsquo; than Leah (although both easily &amp;lsquo;hot&amp;rsquo; enough).  The episode felt a little &amp;lsquo;infomercialish&amp;rsquo;, but was generally good.  Well produced, with good popups, but the voice-over felt stilted and &amp;lsquo;read&amp;rsquo;, rather than natural.
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=gVuxYssH_Fs]
I think the next round should have three contestants, and so Andrea should go through.  I really liked this, and she&amp;rsquo;s a good host, but the environment made it hard to really tell what she would be like in other sorts of episodes.  A brave topic choice, and she&amp;rsquo;s certainly &amp;lsquo;hot&amp;rsquo; enough to be the host (the criteria being &amp;lsquo;hotter than Veronica&amp;rsquo;, I guess!).  Great rapport with the interviewee, good &amp;lsquo;popups&amp;rsquo;, but the questions weren&amp;rsquo;t that interesting.  I&amp;rsquo;d definitely continue to watch daily with Andrea as host.
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=-5MEtsoM1do]
I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t be disappointed if Michelle got through to the next round, but I do think her episode wasn&amp;rsquo;t quite as good as those above.  The hair-flick is annoying, the laugh is a little annoying, and the enthusiasm seemed &lt;em>almost&lt;/em> fake.  On the other hand, it was very well produced.
[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=u4hafDH46qk]
I would like to like Kristina more - there&amp;rsquo;s something appealing about her - but I just can&amp;rsquo;t rank this higher.  An interesting topic, and interesting content, but the episode just didn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;lsquo;pop&amp;rsquo;.  Her interviewing skills aren&amp;rsquo;t really up to scratch.  I&amp;rsquo;d consider watching her in some other show, but she doesn&amp;rsquo;t fit Mahalo Daily, IMO.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OtfWpJmfyU]
Easily the worst.  The comments talk a lot about &amp;ldquo;energy&amp;rdquo; (meaningless drivel, really).  There are three problems: (1) the interviewing skills are terrible (evident in the over-editing, if nowhere else), (2) the facial expressions are off-putting, and (3) frankly, she just isn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;lsquo;hot&amp;rsquo; enough - realistically, the show needs an extremely attractive host (especially if co-hosting with Lon) and while Sarah is pretty, she&amp;rsquo;s not that hot.  Picking a &amp;ldquo;suck-up&amp;rdquo; topic doesn&amp;rsquo;t help.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>