<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Internet on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/internet/</link><description>Recent content in Internet on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:33:49 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/internet/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Vodafone subsumes ihug: can't handle Internet or phone</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/08/29/vodafone-subsumes-ihug-cant-handle-internet-or-phone/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:33:49 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/08/29/vodafone-subsumes-ihug-cant-handle-internet-or-phone/</guid><description>&lt;p>Vodafone, who I used to think was an ok company, bought and then subsumed ihug, who once was a good company (but had previously sunk to terrible depths). Ihug did all sorts of nutty side ventures, but generally was a company specialising in Internet access and phone calls.
I called Vodafone yesterday, and got a &amp;ldquo;sorry, we are experiencing high call volume. Please call back&amp;rdquo; message. And then it hung up! No queue, no way to set up a call &lt;strong>from&lt;/strong> Vodafone back to me to help. Just hanging up on me.
Today, I go to the Vodafone website (because it appears that their DNS servers are dead; thank goodness for &lt;a href="http://opendns.org">OpenDNS&lt;/a>) and I get:
[caption id=&amp;ldquo;attachment_95&amp;rdquo; align=&amp;ldquo;alignnone&amp;rdquo; width=&amp;ldquo;300&amp;rdquo; caption=&amp;ldquo;Vodafone&amp;rdquo;]&lt;a href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/uploads/2008/08/vodafone.png">&lt;img src="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/uploads/2008/08/vodafone.png" alt="Vodafone&amp;rsquo;s home page is down">&lt;/a>[/caption]
If an ISP can&amp;rsquo;t handle serving up their own homepage, are they really a good choice? If you&amp;rsquo;re a business, would you even consider talking to them at this point?&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Meterage</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/06/18/meterage/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:00:55 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2008/06/18/meterage/</guid><description>&lt;p>There was a lengthy discussion on &lt;a href="http://twit.tv/147">this week&amp;rsquo;s&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://twit.tv/twit">TWiT&lt;/a> about bandwidth metering; the topic was discussed on the &lt;a href="http://dailysourcecode.com">Daily Source Code&lt;/a> for a few episodes a while back too.  Although &lt;a href="http://dvorak.com/blog">Dvorak&lt;/a> is often excessively inflammatory and I don&amp;rsquo;t always agree with what he says, this was a case where he was clearly right and everyone else (well, &lt;a href="http://leoville.com">Leo&lt;/a> really did all the talking) is wrong.
The biggest problem is that Leo is confusing two separate issues:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>