<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Kevin J. Anderson on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/kevin-j.-anderson/</link><description>Recent content in Kevin J. Anderson on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:44:06 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/kevin-j.-anderson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Fallout (Kevin J. Anderson &amp; Doug Deason)</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2009/03/15/fallout-kevin-j-anderson-doug-deason/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:44:06 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2009/03/15/fallout-kevin-j-anderson-doug-deason/</guid><description>&lt;p>I quite enjoyed this (a lot more than I enjoyed &lt;em>&lt;a href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.wordpress.com/2009/03/15/resurrection-inc-kevin-j-anderson/">Resurrection Inc.&lt;/a>&lt;/em>).  This is really a pretty straight-forward action/adventure style story (the same sort of story as, e.g., &lt;em>24&lt;/em>).  I read a few stories along these general lines (e.g. the Dan Brown books) over the second half of 2008, and they were a nice break (I read more in this genre a long time back), although nothing was mind-blowingly great.
I gathered that Fallout continues the story of characters from an earlier story (&lt;em>Virtual Destruction&lt;/em>), but not having read that didn&amp;rsquo;t effect my enjoyment of this at all - as far as I can tell, the story is completely standalone.
The plot was a little predictable - it wasn&amp;rsquo;t hard to guess who the villains would turn out to be, but the mystery wasn&amp;rsquo;t really the appeal of the book, and the characters were likable enough.
Overall, well worth a read.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Resurrection Inc. (Kevin J. Anderson)</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2009/03/15/resurrection-inc-kevin-j-anderson/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:35:18 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2009/03/15/resurrection-inc-kevin-j-anderson/</guid><description>&lt;p>For some time, I was posting my mini-reviews on Pownce, which seemed to suit the short format .  I&amp;rsquo;ve mostly switched to using &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/tonyandrewmeyer">Twitter&lt;/a> instead of Pownce now, but 140 characters is a bit too short.  I don&amp;rsquo;t really want to create a new account somewhere else, so I guess they can go here for now.  Maybe I&amp;rsquo;ll start using one of the &amp;rsquo;library&amp;rsquo; sites at some point, and switch to there, or maybe I&amp;rsquo;ll get my &lt;a href="http://delicious-monster.com">Delicious Library&lt;/a> -&amp;gt; web system a bit more automated again and integrate it there somehow.
So, since it&amp;rsquo;s been a while, there&amp;rsquo;s a bit of a backlog.  Firstly, &lt;em>Resurrection Inc.&lt;/em>, by &lt;a href="http://www.wordfire.com/">Kevin K. Anderson&lt;/a>.
I mostly bought this because I recognised the name from &lt;a href="http://isbw.murlafferty.com/">ISBW&lt;/a>.  It was reasonably enjoyable, but nothing spectacular.  A lot of sci-fi deals with immortality, and this didn&amp;rsquo;t seem to introduce anything particularly new or compelling.
I liked the first half more than the second - it didn&amp;rsquo;t end up going where it seemed like it would.  I think partly that I don&amp;rsquo;t have a huge liking for stories about such dreary futures, where humanity are essentially idiots.
Overall, though, I liked it enough to read more Anderson in the future.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>