<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recommendations on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/recommendations/</link><description>Recent content in Recommendations on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:52:12 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/recommendations/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Dealing with recommendations (scifi.stackexchange.com)</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/01/28/276/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:52:12 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/01/28/276/</guid><description>&lt;p>One of the problems that &lt;a href="http://scifi.stackexchange.com">scifi.stackexchange.com&lt;/a> faces that isn&amp;rsquo;t unique to that site is &amp;ldquo;recommendation&amp;rdquo; questions. These are a specific type of list question (which are generally ill-suited to the sites), where each answer offers one possible recommendation, and the votes cast are not just &amp;ldquo;that&amp;rsquo;s a good answer&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;that&amp;rsquo;s a bad answer&amp;rdquo;, but votes for (and less often, against) a suggestion. &lt;a href="http://stackoverflow.com">StackOverflow&lt;/a> has a long history of problems with these sorts of questions (e.g. &amp;ldquo;favourite programming cartoon&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/58640/great-programming-quotes">great programming quotes&lt;/a>&amp;rdquo;).  With few exceptions, these questions are closed, often not before they gather huge numbers of votes, answers, and answer votes.
&lt;a href="http://beartoons.com/2010/01/14/avatar-and-sci-fi-conventions/">&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4063/4274231607_c0ee772a3c_o.jpg" alt="">&lt;/a>I don&amp;rsquo;t really see a huge problem with these questions myself - if they are &amp;ldquo;community wiki&amp;rdquo; then they aren&amp;rsquo;t just a way to gather huge amounts of reputation, the voting has merit (if something is popular, it is likely for a reason), and the format does fit (unlike discussions, for example).  I can understand that a specific site might choose to disallow them (e.g. StackOverflow), but others (e.g. &lt;a href="http://programmers.stackexchange.com">programmers.stackexchange.com&lt;/a>) could allow them.  I don&amp;rsquo;t think that having the majority (or even just a non-small percentage) of a site&amp;rsquo;s questions be ones of this type would do much for the quality, but in moderation they seem ok.
I doubt this would ever be allowed by the powers that be at &lt;a href="http://stackexchange.com">StackExchange&lt;/a>, but I think the following would be a great system for &lt;a href="http://scifi.stackexchange.com">scifi.stackexchange.com&lt;/a>:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>