<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Science Fiction on Tony Andrew Meyer</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/science-fiction/</link><description>Recent content in Science Fiction on Tony Andrew Meyer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-nz</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:04:02 +1200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/tags/science-fiction/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>scifi.stackexchange.com</title><link>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/01/18/scifi-stackexchange-com/</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:04:02 +1200</pubDate><guid>http://tonyandrewmeyer.com/2011/01/18/scifi-stackexchange-com/</guid><description>&lt;p>The &lt;a href="http://scifi.stackexchange.com">Science Fiction&lt;/a> &lt;a href="http://stackexchange.com">StackExchange&lt;/a> site came out of private beta today.  It&amp;rsquo;s not the first proposal that I committed to that has made it to beta (that was &lt;a href="http://boardgames.stackexchange.com/">Card/Board&lt;/a> games), I&amp;rsquo;ve found it more interesting (so far) - Card/Board games has so far focused on a lot of games that I have no interest in (and I&amp;rsquo;m not so interested or have enough time to ask a lot of questions myself).
&lt;a href="http://www.uniquities.co.uk/acatalog/Get_your_GEEK_on.html">&lt;img src="http://www.uniquities.co.uk/acatalog/ts-SciFi.jpg" alt="Awesome looking stuff. Go buy some :)">&lt;/a>
The current state of scifi.stackexchange is a little worrying - as might be expected, there are a lot of list/opinion/subjective/discussion questions, which aren&amp;rsquo;t really a good fit for a SE site.  A lot of questions are &amp;ldquo;community wiki&amp;rdquo;, which reflects this, and that means that reputation is hard to come by for many users.  It seems like there might already be a lot of &amp;lsquo;definitive&amp;rsquo; factbook-type sites for many of the major scifi stories (e.g. wookiepedia for Star Wars), and there&amp;rsquo;s little point just duplicating that information (even Wikipedia has a lot of data, presumably because of a sci-fi bias among many of the editors).
However, there does seem to be a lot of potential for the &amp;ldquo;long tail&amp;rdquo; type of questions that SE is designed to address.  There&amp;rsquo;s certainly a lot of lesser-known scifi novels/TV shows that don&amp;rsquo;t have a lot of information about them online.  It looks like &amp;ldquo;identify this book&amp;rdquo; type questions will be acceptable as well, which definitely seems like it would be valuable (even when coming from a Google search).  Overall, I&amp;rsquo;m hopeful - so go check it out!
I&amp;rsquo;m still waiting for the &lt;a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/4861/parenting?referrer=gpAujPYC8PTSZ2Kzwn8oXQ2">Parenting&lt;/a> StackExchange site to reach the beta phase.  It might end up being a huge mess of subjective opinion, but it might also end up being a truly valuable resource.  If you&amp;rsquo;re interested, commit!&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>